Minimalism in UX Design: Fading Trend or Timeless Principle?

Written by Godwin Okwong
Imagine walking into a room that’s perfectly tidy, with only the essentials in sight — just the right amount of furniture, soft lighting, and clean lines. There’s no clutter, no excess. It feels good, doesn’t it? That’s minimalism. But here’s the real question: is this sleek, no-nonsense style still the king of design, or are we starting to miss a little chaos now and then?
This article intends to reflect on the evolution of minimalism in UX design, providing insights into its current relevance. Readers are encouraged to rethink their approach to minimalism, ensuring that functionality and user needs are always at the forefront.
![]() |
Soft tones with modern minimalist home décor by Decorilla designer, Raneem K. |
Minimalism has been a favorite in both home décor and digital spaces for years. Think of those airy interiors in Japan or Scandinavia where every piece of furniture has a clear purpose. But in the world of user experience (UX) design, we need to ask: has minimalism overstayed its welcome? Let’s break down its rise, where it stands today, and whether it’s still serving users effectively — or if it’s just getting… well, boring.
A Quick History Lesson on Minimalism
Minimalism in UX didn’t just pop up out of nowhere. It’s rooted in the broader minimalist movement that started in art and architecture in the 1960s. The idea was to strip things down to their essence — nothing extra, nothing flashy. Fast-forward to the digital age, and this philosophy made its way into user experience and interface design.
Apple, arguably one of the most influential companies in shaping minimalist design, pushed the envelope with its clean and functional products. Look at the iPhone — no extra buttons, no unnecessary frills. The same goes for its interfaces. Apple products scream simplicity, and that’s part of what made them so iconic.
But wait, here’s the kicker: minimalism wasn’t just about aesthetics. It was also about focusing on functionality. Less stuff to look at, fewer distractions — so users could do what they came to do. Clean, intuitive, and with no visual noise. But has that formula started to feel a little… bland?

Is Less Really More? Or Just Less?
Here’s where the debate begins. On the one hand, minimalism does make things feel simple and easy to use — like when you walk into an Airbnb that feels effortlessly homey with a modern touch, not a tacky rental stuffed with too much furniture and unnecessary knick-knacks. In fact, Airbnb recently updated their design, balancing minimalism with a dash of personality. It’s clean, but not sterile. They’ve learned that users want a little warmth and character mixed in with their simplicity.
On the other hand, minimalism can sometimes go too far. There’s this trend of “hiding” things behind buttons or in menus to keep the interface clean. But if users have to hunt for basic functions like they’re playing hide-and-seek, is that really helping anyone? It’s like having a super-modern living room where you can’t find the remote because it’s hidden in the art installation. Frustrating, right?
![]() |
The Art of Minimalism in UI Design by Leonardo Moreno |
There’s a sweet spot between clean design and functional ease, and some argue that minimalism might be sacrificing a bit too much for the sake of aesthetics.
Apple, Still the Minimalist Champ?

Speaking of Apple, we can’t talk about minimalism without bringing up the iPhone, iPad, and the MacBook. Apple’s design philosophy is all about simplicity. You’ve got sleek surfaces, rounded edges, and minimal buttons. It’s sexy, no doubt about it. But how many times have you tried to close all those hidden tabs or apps that are lurking behind that clean interface?
Apple’s consistent approach to design is what makes it stand out, but even Apple has had to evolve. If you look closely at recent updates, you’ll notice they’ve added some depth and complexity back into their designs. More shadows, subtle gradients, and slightly more options. It’s like they’ve realized that, sometimes, users need just a bit more than bare bones to function happily.
The Airbnb Refresh: A Minimalist Tune-Up
![]() |
New AirBnB home screen (Source) |
Take Airbnb as another case study. Their recent design refresh is a prime example of how minimalism can be reimagined. They started with a very minimalist interface, but users began to crave more visual cues and storytelling elements. So, Airbnb kept the clean look but added more warmth and charm — images of beautiful homes, easy-to-use filters, and a touch of personality. They struck a balance between minimalism and functionality, reminding us that even minimalism needs a little texture sometimes.
Minimalism in UX: Serving Users or Designers?
Here’s a funny truth about minimalism: it often pleases designers more than it pleases users. We love those clean lines, perfectly balanced white spaces, and a color palette of soft greys. But users? They want to get stuff done. And sometimes minimalism gets in the way of that. When everything is hidden behind sleek interfaces, it can lead to confusion.
Think of it like this: you walk into a perfectly minimalist home, but you can’t figure out how to turn on the lights or where the door handle is. That’s how minimalism can feel when it goes too far. Functionality should never be sacrificed for the sake of aesthetics. It’s like having a gorgeous sofa that’s so uncomfortable you’d rather sit on the floor.
Does Minimalism Work Everywhere?
Here’s another question: does minimalism work in every culture? In many Asian countries, especially Japan, minimalism is a way of life. Look at traditional Japanese interiors — clean lines, minimal décor, and a focus on functionality. The same principles are applied to digital design. But in other cultures, minimalism can feel cold and impersonal. Sometimes, people like a little visual richness and color — something to make things feel more alive.

This is why cultural context matters. Not everyone interprets “simple” as “better.” Some cultures thrive on vibrancy and richness, so a minimalist design might not always resonate.
Fading Trend or Timeless Principle?
Now to the big question: Is minimalism in UX design just a passing trend, or is it here to stay? Honestly, it’s a bit of both.
Minimalism, when done right, will always have a place in design because it emphasizes clarity, focus, and ease of use. But like all trends, it evolves. We’re seeing minimalism shift from being ultra-sparse and cold to a more balanced approach that includes personality, warmth, and subtle complexity — just enough to keep things interesting without overwhelming users.

Think of it like fashion. That little black dress will never go out of style, but the way you accessorize it might change over the years.
Is Minimalism Still for You?
So, is minimalism still serving users effectively? Yes, but with a twist. We’re moving past the days of purely sterile interfaces and into a future where minimalism can still be sleek and functional, but with a touch more heart. The key is balance. Don’t hide essential features in the name of cleanliness, and remember that not all users want the same thing. A little warmth, a little personality, and a lot of functionality — now that is timeless.
Minimalism in UX design isn’t dead, but it’s definitely growing up. And like all good things, it’s finding a way to age gracefully.
Follow us across our social platforms and stay tuned for our next episode.
Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Blog
See our previous article; THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COLOR IN UX DESIGN
Comments
Post a Comment
Please, leave us a message. We respond as soon as possible